<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mike Roselli, EIMike Roselli, EI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikeroselli.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net</link>
	<description>Civil Engineering Portfolio &#38; Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:02:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta name="generator" content="Obscure 2.0" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics &#8220;Bypassing&#8221; Engineering by Signal Warrants and Why We Use Them &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net/politics-bypassing-engineering/comment-page-1#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Signal Warrants and Why We Use Them &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeroselli.net/?p=389#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] misfortune, but that politicians should make engineering decisions. There is a problem when the politically inclined try to mingle in the affairs of those who put safety first, a perfect reason why engineers should use MUTCD warrants instead of bending to political pressure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] misfortune, but that politicians should make engineering decisions. There is a problem when the politically inclined try to mingle in the affairs of those who put safety first, a perfect reason why engineers should use MUTCD warrants instead of bending to political pressure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics &#8220;Bypassing&#8221; Engineering by Railroad Grade-Crossing Hazards &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net/politics-bypassing-engineering/comment-page-1#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Railroad Grade-Crossing Hazards &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeroselli.net/?p=389#comment-258</guid>
		<description>[...] Two weeks ago, an unfortunate collision occurred at a railroad grade crossing in Maine. Reuters reports that a dump truck was hit by an Amtrak train and the driver was fatally wounded. Four passengers aboard the train were injured as well. Terrible. At-grade railroad crossings are some of the most dangerous intersections we have on our road system and they should be avoided whenever possible. Fortunately, many public agencies are fully aware of hazards associated with them and are taking steps to fix them. Here is a list of policies in the United States associated with at-grade crossings, published by the Federal Highway Administration. If you live in North Carolina, rest assured that NCDOT can and will use its power to remove, abandon, close, or regulate all railroad grade crossings. That is, if politicians don&#8217;t try to stop the sensibilities of the engineers there. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two weeks ago, an unfortunate collision occurred at a railroad grade crossing in Maine. Reuters reports that a dump truck was hit by an Amtrak train and the driver was fatally wounded. Four passengers aboard the train were injured as well. Terrible. At-grade railroad crossings are some of the most dangerous intersections we have on our road system and they should be avoided whenever possible. Fortunately, many public agencies are fully aware of hazards associated with them and are taking steps to fix them. Here is a list of policies in the United States associated with at-grade crossings, published by the Federal Highway Administration. If you live in North Carolina, rest assured that NCDOT can and will use its power to remove, abandon, close, or regulate all railroad grade crossings. That is, if politicians don&#8217;t try to stop the sensibilities of the engineers there. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What You Can Do About NC-H.561 by Politics &#8220;Bypassing&#8221; Engineering &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net/what-you-can-do-about-nc-h-561/comment-page-1#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics &#8220;Bypassing&#8221; Engineering &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 12:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeroselli.net/?p=449#comment-215</guid>
		<description>[...] Bottom line? Let engineers do their jobs. And write your representatives an email and tell them. I certainly did. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bottom line? Let engineers do their jobs. And write your representatives an email and tell them. I certainly did. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics &#8220;Bypassing&#8221; Engineering by What You Can Do About NC-H.561 &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net/politics-bypassing-engineering/comment-page-1#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>What You Can Do About NC-H.561 &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 15:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeroselli.net/?p=389#comment-207</guid>
		<description>[...] following is an email I sent to Wake County Representatives, concerning the issue of legislation-run engineering. If you can, write something similar RIGHT NOW to your representatives. A list of NC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following is an email I sent to Wake County Representatives, concerning the issue of legislation-run engineering. If you can, write something similar RIGHT NOW to your representatives. A list of NC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics &#8220;Bypassing&#8221; Engineering by Open Letter to Rep. LaRoque &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net/politics-bypassing-engineering/comment-page-1#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Letter to Rep. LaRoque &#124; Mike Roselli, EI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 01:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeroselli.net/?p=389#comment-199</guid>
		<description>[...] The following is an email I sent to Representative Stephen LaRoque, concerning the issue of legislation-run engineering: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The following is an email I sent to Representative Stephen LaRoque, concerning the issue of legislation-run engineering: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics &#8220;Bypassing&#8221; Engineering by Mike Roselli</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net/politics-bypassing-engineering/comment-page-1#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Roselli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeroselli.net/?p=389#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Indeed it could be the other way around. I cross-out &quot;bought&quot; and write &quot;elected&quot; to imply tongue-bitingly correcting my original thought with politically correct jargon. Yes, it seems people get what they deserve in a true democracy, but that implies that public ignorance necessarily justifies poor government policy. While this may be the case, it indeed deserves reflection and modification where possible from those with the capacity to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it could be the other way around. I cross-out &#8220;bought&#8221; and write &#8220;elected&#8221; to imply tongue-bitingly correcting my original thought with politically correct jargon. Yes, it seems people get what they deserve in a true democracy, but that implies that public ignorance necessarily justifies poor government policy. While this may be the case, it indeed deserves reflection and modification where possible from those with the capacity to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics &#8220;Bypassing&#8221; Engineering by Erik Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net/politics-bypassing-engineering/comment-page-1#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 19:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeroselli.net/?p=389#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Dear Mike,

In your post, you have stricken out the word bought, and replaced it with the word elected.  I&#039;m pretty sure you meant it the other way?  Now, if the state legislature were faithful representatives of their constituencies, then it would seem highly appropriate to me that they should override the decisions of engineers in the face of the demands of the people.  Remember, true Democracy gives the people exactly the government they deserve.  However, when it is because of campaign finance (as it always is) that a given policy decision is made, everybody who votes yes should be summarily executed and their seats offered to somebody who is prepared to faithfully execute the will of the people or reap the whirlwind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mike,</p>
<p>In your post, you have stricken out the word bought, and replaced it with the word elected.  I&#8217;m pretty sure you meant it the other way?  Now, if the state legislature were faithful representatives of their constituencies, then it would seem highly appropriate to me that they should override the decisions of engineers in the face of the demands of the people.  Remember, true Democracy gives the people exactly the government they deserve.  However, when it is because of campaign finance (as it always is) that a given policy decision is made, everybody who votes yes should be summarily executed and their seats offered to somebody who is prepared to faithfully execute the will of the people or reap the whirlwind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on T.E.D. Ideas by Hersh</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net/t-e-d-ideas/comment-page-1#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Hersh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeroselli.net/?p=164#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Although Top Gear is hardly a legitimate source of news there was an interesting bit on there last season (I think) where they interviewed the lady who was responsible for the design behind all of the UKs street signs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwjXoHLP_7U</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Top Gear is hardly a legitimate source of news there was an interesting bit on there last season (I think) where they interviewed the lady who was responsible for the design behind all of the UKs street signs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwjXoHLP_7U" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwjXoHLP_7U</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No P.E., No job? by G$/HK</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeroselli.net/no-p-e-no-job/comment-page-1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>G$/HK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeroselli.net/?p=117#comment-30</guid>
		<description>When the economy turns around, industries will once again turn to entry-level engineers to fill their ranks.  EIT&#039;s will step in to do the work that they have always done while in training, and the cycle will continue.  Granted, for many years, there may be shortage of PEs stamping plans and approving documents.  But, the work will still be getting done, regardless of if a PE is doing it or not.  Is this damaging to engineering as a profession?  Yes.  It is damaging to your future career?  No.  You will get your experience, and eventually you will get your PE.  It&#039;s just taking a little bit of extra time because of circumstances that are beyond our generation&#039;s control.  Unfortunately, irresponsibility of an older generation brought this unfortunate situation upon us, and now it&#039;s ours to behold.

Thanks for posting this.  There isn&#039;t enough discussion on this right now, so I&#039;m going to contribute too.

As I see the big picture, the US economy was churning along at an artificially-accelerated pace for many years.  People were spending money that didn&#039;t exist- and everyone was fine with it, because everyone was doing it.  Then, all the sudden, the debt had to be collected, and people realized that everyone rushing ahead wasn&#039;t keeping the playing field level and the books balanced because some people run faster than others.  The lenders were lending because they trusted that the winners would eventually share some of their spoils, but eventually they stopped sharing.  Then, the lenders either had to collect the debt or perish, and so they collected, and they pulled everyone that was artificially ahead of the game down with them.  Now, everyone is playing the waiting game, waiting for the playing field to level out again.  

It used to be that regardless of who was running how fast, engineers could always get a job.  The nature of our profession is that we rise high on the tide of success, and yet still don&#039;t fall so hard when it wanes.  This is usually a pretty good gig- the reward we get for paying it forward during the many hard years of undergrad.  Therefore, quite expectedly but unfortunately, our profession was way at the head of that artificially-accelerating economy.  Now, we&#039;ve been pulled back down to Earth, and we&#039;re all waiting, just like everyone else. 

So yes, this is hurting Engineering, and we feel that is not right.  However, everyone is being hurt by this, and we&#039;re just getting our fair share.  I&#039;m sorry that you haven&#039;t found work yet.  But just remember, you are in a very good position.  You have an Engineering degree from one of the best engineering schools in the nation.  Think of how far ahead that puts you compared to everyone that graduates from a community college, junior college, or with a non-technical or professional degree.  Unfortunately, for recent engineering grads, it&#039;s just not a buyer&#039;s market right now.  There is a high supply of much more experienced engineers out there willing to work for much less than before, and they have the edge on all of us.  Just remember--they were riding high on the top of that economic wave when it came crashing down.  They lost their careers, everything they had worked for with those companies for many years.  I think right now, they could use the jobs a little more than the rest of us younger engineers, we who can weather out this storm a little better.  Most recent engineering grads don&#039;t have families that need food on the table tonight- another plus/minus of our choice of profession.

All that being said, this is undoubtedly a huge strain on Civil Engineering, and the engineering profession, as a whole.  I do agree with you that state licensing boards and companies nationwide need to buckle down on PE requirements to make sure that there is no dishonesty in our profession.  I hope, and am sure, that they recognize this strain and are reacting accordingly.  It&#039;s their job.  But, if they aren&#039;t, it&#039;s our job to keep them in check.  They have the responsibility--on paper--to uphold the professionalism of engineering.  But, it is each engineer&#039;s moral obligation to ensure that we keep them, and each other, in check.  Off paper, the responsibility of professionalism is all of ours.  That&#039;s why I&#039;m a member of the Order of the Engineer.

-G$/HK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the economy turns around, industries will once again turn to entry-level engineers to fill their ranks.  EIT&#8217;s will step in to do the work that they have always done while in training, and the cycle will continue.  Granted, for many years, there may be shortage of PEs stamping plans and approving documents.  But, the work will still be getting done, regardless of if a PE is doing it or not.  Is this damaging to engineering as a profession?  Yes.  It is damaging to your future career?  No.  You will get your experience, and eventually you will get your PE.  It&#8217;s just taking a little bit of extra time because of circumstances that are beyond our generation&#8217;s control.  Unfortunately, irresponsibility of an older generation brought this unfortunate situation upon us, and now it&#8217;s ours to behold.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this.  There isn&#8217;t enough discussion on this right now, so I&#8217;m going to contribute too.</p>
<p>As I see the big picture, the US economy was churning along at an artificially-accelerated pace for many years.  People were spending money that didn&#8217;t exist- and everyone was fine with it, because everyone was doing it.  Then, all the sudden, the debt had to be collected, and people realized that everyone rushing ahead wasn&#8217;t keeping the playing field level and the books balanced because some people run faster than others.  The lenders were lending because they trusted that the winners would eventually share some of their spoils, but eventually they stopped sharing.  Then, the lenders either had to collect the debt or perish, and so they collected, and they pulled everyone that was artificially ahead of the game down with them.  Now, everyone is playing the waiting game, waiting for the playing field to level out again.  </p>
<p>It used to be that regardless of who was running how fast, engineers could always get a job.  The nature of our profession is that we rise high on the tide of success, and yet still don&#8217;t fall so hard when it wanes.  This is usually a pretty good gig- the reward we get for paying it forward during the many hard years of undergrad.  Therefore, quite expectedly but unfortunately, our profession was way at the head of that artificially-accelerating economy.  Now, we&#8217;ve been pulled back down to Earth, and we&#8217;re all waiting, just like everyone else. </p>
<p>So yes, this is hurting Engineering, and we feel that is not right.  However, everyone is being hurt by this, and we&#8217;re just getting our fair share.  I&#8217;m sorry that you haven&#8217;t found work yet.  But just remember, you are in a very good position.  You have an Engineering degree from one of the best engineering schools in the nation.  Think of how far ahead that puts you compared to everyone that graduates from a community college, junior college, or with a non-technical or professional degree.  Unfortunately, for recent engineering grads, it&#8217;s just not a buyer&#8217;s market right now.  There is a high supply of much more experienced engineers out there willing to work for much less than before, and they have the edge on all of us.  Just remember&#8211;they were riding high on the top of that economic wave when it came crashing down.  They lost their careers, everything they had worked for with those companies for many years.  I think right now, they could use the jobs a little more than the rest of us younger engineers, we who can weather out this storm a little better.  Most recent engineering grads don&#8217;t have families that need food on the table tonight- another plus/minus of our choice of profession.</p>
<p>All that being said, this is undoubtedly a huge strain on Civil Engineering, and the engineering profession, as a whole.  I do agree with you that state licensing boards and companies nationwide need to buckle down on PE requirements to make sure that there is no dishonesty in our profession.  I hope, and am sure, that they recognize this strain and are reacting accordingly.  It&#8217;s their job.  But, if they aren&#8217;t, it&#8217;s our job to keep them in check.  They have the responsibility&#8211;on paper&#8211;to uphold the professionalism of engineering.  But, it is each engineer&#8217;s moral obligation to ensure that we keep them, and each other, in check.  Off paper, the responsibility of professionalism is all of ours.  That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m a member of the Order of the Engineer.</p>
<p>-G$/HK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

